The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The change in rates of tourists visiting four Brighton destinations in England is illustrated in the line graph above.
The first impression is that Pavilion was the most popular among all. While more visitors favored Pavilion and Pier, fewer people chose Festival and Art Gallery over time.
In particular, there was a rather dramatic trend in the percentage of visitors to Pavilion. A double increase from 24% in 1980 to 48% in 1995 was followed by a pretty significant drop to almost 30% in 2010. Despite sharing a similar tendency in general, Pier witnessed its rate fluctuate continuously every five years until 2000 when the figure rose nonstop for 10 years.
On the other hand, in 1985, Art Gallery became the second tourist-favor attraction which had the rate at 38%. From that point onward, the number suffered a sudden decrease, a subtle improvement, and a gradual dropping trend toward 2010. It was shown in the graph that there was the slightest change in the percentage of people visiting festivals as a tourist destination. This went down a little to 25% from 30% in 1980-1995 and then went up not as much to 27% at the end.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-31 maiphuonganh 56 view
2023-08-31 maiphuonganh 11 view
2023-08-31 maiphuonganh 11 view
2023-06-19 ililmaidatuz 78 view
2023-06-19 ililmaidatuz 78 view
Essays by user NhNhSF :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, while, in general, in particular, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83673469388 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65713972225 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65306122449 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.463033336 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118035552836 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497698045681 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751175233019 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.090572311083 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0974621841879 0.0819641961636 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.