The line graph shows the cost for watching films. The pie charts show the change in the percentage of market share represented by the three forms.
The line graph illustrates how much money was spent on watching films in 3 primary forms namely cinemas, DVDs and legal download as well as the percentage split among the three forms given in the pie charts.
Overall, cinema tickets were notably the most expensive type of watching movies. Particularly, more people chose to rent a DVD rather than watching online or going to the movie theatres.
In 2005, cinema ticket cost stood at around £9, £3 higher than DVD renting price, then the figure increased gradually to about £11.5 in 2009 before surging to £14 in the end. Over the same period, the amount of money spent on renting DVDs saw a gradual rise of just £2 over the time shown. Finally, users had to pay more to download movies online in 2005, at £8; however, the cost declined sharply to £6 in 2006, then it saw a significant rise of £3 to stand at £9 in 2011.
The number of people rented a DVD contributed of nearly three fourth of the total in 2005, then the figure dropped to just over one second of the total 6 years later. Only 30% of citizens went to the cinema, compared to just 6% of those watching online in 2005, then the former saw a decrease of 12% while the latter experienced a dramatic increase of 20% in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | nvtd | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012. 53
- The pie charts below show the causes the diseases in developing and developed countries 89
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51315789474 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26768807441 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587719298246 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.5307127161 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.625 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0948021263667 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402856773904 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043332239773 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0651686952966 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050560113585 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.