The maps illustrate the transformation of a town called Harborne between 1963 and 2007.
Overall, the city are more developed, cutting out some of natural beauty, extending residential area and providing more options for shopping and leisure activities.
From 1963 to 2007, the area around the river was developed into a residential area in the northeastern of the city. The number of trees located in the northwest was dropped significantly during the period of 71 years.
A new shopping centre was built in the center of the town, when the post office, bank and library were remained. The sweet shop and butchers were replaced with a supermarket. Across the post office, there was a new travel agent, right beside the bank, where the flower shop used to be. The bike path was redesigned as a road. In the southeast, the government offices were converted into a museum, and the farmland besie turned into a golf course.
- the graph below gives information about the preferred leisure activities of Australian children. 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- A survey conducted for the places in which people gain access to the Internet from 1998 to 2004 62
- Look at the maps below showing how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007 and summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features Make comparison where relevant 11
- Look at the maps below showing how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007, and summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features. Make comparison where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to be. The bike path was redesigned as a road. In the southeast, the government...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70081074832 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7390128435 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2222222222 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0715968373029 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320112802351 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528224575682 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0594421730863 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659995363638 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.