The maps illustrate some changes that were made in the village Stokeford between the years 1930 and 2010.
It is noticeable that three main modifications took place during the aforementioned time period in the village’s infrastructure. These included the addition of a plethora of houses, the construction of a retirement home and the renovation of the primary school.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see that in 1930 there was a farmland in the south side of the village, between the River Stoke and the main road, as well as in the eastern part. By contrast, in 2010, these two farmlands have been replaced by houses which were built at either side of the main road in the south and the centre of the village. In addition, there were built two roads in the north-east side of the village, each of whom is surrounded by new houses.
The two maps also show that changes were made related to village’s facilities. In 2007, there was no retirement home and the primary school was consisted of one main building. However, by 2010, a new retirement home was built in the eastern side of the village instead of a large house and some gardens that were located in this side in the past. Also, two buildings were added in the primary school. It is clear that the bridge in the northern side and the post office in the west remained unchanged, but in 2010 there were no shops in the village any more.
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- As countries become more developed many fast food outlets move into the country giving local people greater access to fast food Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The pie chart below shows tge results of a survey of the causes foor poor learning outcomes in schools in a particularly country in 2011 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62450592885 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56769188251 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8667201046 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.363636364 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10797012623 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508791263454 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637527046464 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857376848246 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704211591174 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.