the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010. summarise the information and make comparison where relevant.

The maps illustrate the Stokeford village in 1930 and 2010.

The Stokeford village in 1930, the primary school which was situated in the centre of the village, and it was adjacent to gardens and a large house to the Southern part, whereas farmland and a bridge located on the North Eastside. From Northern to Southern, there was a road which was surrounded by shops, houses, and a post office in the centre of the village. Additionally, there was a river stoke which passed towards the North East Corner from the Southwest, where another farmland was located.

After 80 years, the Stokeford village experienced some modifications. In detail, there was a road which created several paths along with an increasing the number of houses from the North to the South towards the centre of the village. From the centre of the village to the Eastern region, there were gardens and large houses modified to a retirement home. The shops which were located in the centre of the village and both farmlands either the North-Eastern one and the Southwest one disappeared except the post office and a primary school which were either side of the road in the centre of the village. Moreover, also the river stoke and bridge did not change

Overall, there were some modifications that the Stakeford village experienced, the most noticeable thing was about a retirement home which was utterly modified.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he Stokeford village in 1930 and 2010. The Stokeford village in 1930, the prima...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, where another farmland was located. After 80 years, the Stokeford village ex...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... river stoke and bridge did not change Overall, there were some modifications t...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1163.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99141630901 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60973851941 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459227467811 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5480010879 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.222222222 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920808287059 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667654854097 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895875005611 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108933474044 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112888281344 0.0819641961636 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.