The Map highlights the changes in the Museum from 1957 to 2007
The given maps compare the renovations that have taken place in a museum over a period of 50 years from 1957 to 2007.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the museum has undergone numerous changes resulting in better layout, improved infrastructure, and additional facilities. However, the main entrance and a small garden remain unaltered.
According to the given illustration, the lush green area and the middle road has been eradicated. In the Southeast of the layout, car parking has been constructed by uprooting old trees.
There is an expansion in the museum's eastern end. A museum shop with a front entrance has replaced the local history room, which is now shifted to the central section. The entrance hall has been converted into a reception center. Just to the right, a cafe has taken place after the museum storeroom is knocked down. The National history exhibition section is further distributed to accommodate a special exhibition and an educational center.
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 84
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 84
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 84
- The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24074074074 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88086492499 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2477450316 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232811285515 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071189139482 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102416416374 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137009137806 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124569387562 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.