The maps provide information about modifications which have been taken place in a Grange park over a period of hundred years.
Overall, there are many changes have been taken place in Grange park; however, the most prominent change is seen in the western and eastern part of the park.
In 1920, there were two entrances at the park; one is at northern side whereas other one is at southern side. There was a fountain in the middle of the park. Apart from that, western part of the park was occupied by stage for musicians along with two rose garden and four seating arrangement. In the east, water pond and glasshouse were established along with rose garden and one seating area.
These days, the entrances are remained as it is; however one additional entrance is built for underground car park at south-east corner. In the west, amphitheatre for concert is established by removing the stage for musicians. All the rose garden and seating facilities are relocated at the middle part of the park by demolishing the fountain. Additionally, pond is replaced by children's play area and cafe. Apart from that, glasshouse is removed to make the water feature in the south-east corner.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- In spite of advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problems 56
- In spite of advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problems 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92537313433 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62859885534 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1389846276 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0497229943672 0.215688989381 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0221732348735 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0279467589278 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.032901034114 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276703306982 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.