The maps illustrate the plan of transformation of islip town center in comparison with its current layout.
As can be seen from the maps, the centre’s structure will modify dramatically with more amenities.
Currently, this centre has a main road running from the west to the east, with two short lanes. The lane in the west leads to a school but at the end of the shorter eastern one is a park. Between those two lanes, there are two ranges of shops along the side of the road, with housing the south and a countryside area located in the north.
The plan is to totally change its layout into a circle area for pedestrians only, which will be covered by a dual carriageway. Therefore, the countryside and the main road will be eradicated but the row of shops in its southern side will remain intact. The other side of the old road will witness the construction of a bus station, a shopping center and a car park respectively from the west to east. The School will remain unchanged outside the circle but a park is planned to be diminished and located inside the pedestrian area. Beside some pedestrian areas that are now exist, there will be a new one on the right of the car park and another on the left of the park.
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 56
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people.To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 574, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...side some pedestrian areas that are now exist, there will be a new one on the right o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48660714286 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57690621315 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526785714286 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1318156161 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.5 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106341798982 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0508596959697 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641174592575 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867741906088 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813678514409 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.