The maps depict the comparison of Istip town centre between current condition and planned development in the future.
It is clear that in the future some facilities, Bus station, Shopping centre, Car park, New housing, pedestrians path and dual carriageway that surround the town, will be established in the future.
In Northern area, currently, shops and countryside are situating there. It is set to be demolsihed for establishing Bus station in West and New housing will be built in Eastern part. Among them Shopping centre and Car park will be developed while Main road is planned to be Pedestrians path. Interestingly, dual carriageway will surround the town centre in the future.
In Southern area, the location of School and Housing in South, Shops in centre, Park in West will remain same although School and Housing will be separated from other buildings by dual carriageway. Moreover, New housing will be built beside the Park.
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 85
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20261437908 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78078268842 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1650210105 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0816619752133 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490334881582 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590088739207 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719294176835 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699847255674 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.