The maps display the evolutions of a town following the building of a hydro powerplant between 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the rural areas were removed after the construction of the dam across the river, and the north part of the river was converted into a lake.
In 1990, the river ran across the town from the north to the south. By 2010, the hydro electronic dam was constructed across the center of the river, and the lake was built to the north of the dam. To the south of the dam, two and six electronic towers were added to the east and the west of the river, respectively. These towers replaced the mountains and rare plants/ animals to the west of the river.
In addition, the ancient structure, to the west of the river, was demolished, and the forest was chopped down, which was in the northwest of the town. The irrigated farmlands, on the east of the river, were removed, and the villages, right to the farmlands, were relocated to the southeast to build a hotel. The mountains in the northeast were the only natural feature, which remained unchanged over the period.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement High school students should wear uniforms to schools 78
- The graph shows the spending on education medical care and pension in a particular country from 2001 to 2051 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps show improvements that have been made to a university campus between 2010 and the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63212435233 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49279344678 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7097006878 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124959742441 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559851931808 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498157359198 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891335108175 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039738976846 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.