The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The provided maps elucidates the current industrial zone in the town of Norbiton and its developmental plan. Overall, it is evident that this area will experience a significant refurbishment, including expanding the land, developing the road system and adding more amenities.
The current traffic roundabout will be renovated and expanded to the northern west and the north of the map, which will connect to the otherside of the river. Consequently, they are planning to use a part of the farmland to create housing which will be located in front of the novel roundabout.
Another substantial development is the replacement of existing factories by houses and some additional amenities, such as situating shops and a medical center at the corner of the traffic roundabout. Furthermore, the strategic location of school and playground will be considered to be positioned in which limits the access of vehicles, such as the end of the road for a school and in the middle area of the residential zone for the playground.
- Many people like to eat unhealthy food even though they know it s bad for them Why is this What is an effective way to improve people s healthy eating habits 84
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an aging population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an agi 61
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 73
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15662650602 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09837730698 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.8355512747 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0992927361408 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584273515431 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062621894978 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768403045939 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631399886428 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.