The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future.
The diagrams illustrate information regarding how an office building will be transformed in the future, compared to the present. Overall, it is readily apparent that this construction is scheduled to experience extensive renovations and rearrangements, the most noticeable of which is the amalgamation of interior space and the addition of new facilities.
Regarding the interior space, at the front of the building, four offices will be demolished to amalgamate into two larger offices. Additionally, the main entrance which is originally on the right side of the building will be relocated to the center, sandwiching two novel offices. To the back of the building, the storeroom will remain untouched in terms of size and position whereas two new offices will be erected to replace the kitchen and the canteen. Moreover, toilets which are currently situated in front of the storeroom will be changed positions to the back right corner of the building.
Concerning the exterior space, while the grass contiguous to the side entrance will be cleared and converted into an outdoor seating area with chairs, the remaining grass will be merged into the interior space. In this newly extended area, there will be a coffee machine adjacent to the storeroom, and a meeting area with two chairs at the front of the space.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | letrang250191 | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | thaocbh | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | thaocbh | 73 | view |
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 24 02 2019 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at Forton Valley City from 2000 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21126760563 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89507338226 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521126760563 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5739696159 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.75 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0921107953807 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526390569994 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657949335357 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746171331012 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481245622897 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.