The maps show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparison where relevant
The maps illustrate an industrial area in the town of Norbiton at the present as well as the future of the town is planned to improve.
In general, the town will witness the significant changes in the future in which housing, a school, shops and medical center are developed.
To begin with, as can be seen from maps, there will be a bridge over the river and a new road in the North of the map whereas another road will connect that bridge and the roundabout in the center of the town. More houses and a road will be constructed while shops are expected to exit in the North West region. In addition, another roundabout which is smaller than the central one will be built in the South of the town. Moreover, a hospital will be established next to the new roundabout.
On the other hand, a school will be constructed in the West while a playground is predicted in the North East. Finally, just a part of the farmland in the present will remain in the future.
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behaviour What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 56
- the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise in the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparati 73
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in general, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44943820225 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47632394494 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0944035119 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.75 5.23603664747 282% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111204271411 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592213106341 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108213279961 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108334828197 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135245493703 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, in general, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.44943820225 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47632394494 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494382022472 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0944035119 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.75 5.23603664747 282% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111204271411 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592213106341 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108213279961 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108334828197 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135245493703 0.0819641961636 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.