Oil use of major consumers
The amount of oil kegs used each day by four main regions, namely US, Western Europe and Japan, China, Middle East, over the 21-year period from 2009 to 2030 is depicted in the line chart. Generally, oil consumption in Middle East and China is expected an increase whilst that of the other two regions is predicted a decrease during the period shown.
There was a completely opposite in daily oil consumption between Middle East and Western Europe & Japan. In 2009, nearly 4 million kegs and 2 million kegs used per day by former and latter, respectively. In the next 16 years, evaluations reveal that the figure of Western Europe & Japan will decline while Middle East will rise and both of them will encounter at around 3 million kegs in late 2025. After that, it is forecast that the figures will continue to evolve according to previous its trends, the former will use just over 2 million kegs and approximately 3 million kegs for the latter.
- Leisure time in a typical week in hour by sex and employment status, 1998-99 96
- Meadowside village development 73
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses.Why? Who benefit from this, the community or these young people? 84
- Wheat Exports from 1985 to 1990 (in million tonnes) 78
- The chart below shows average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74545454545 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4313589469 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.9864476247 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110436944714 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629982338554 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343389005657 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962630095188 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244654659841 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.