Percentage of food budget on restaurant meals home cooking.
The given circular chart and linear chart depict the information about which food budget by restaurant meals, home cooking.it is data is calibrated into per centum .it is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that which the data of fast food is maximum ratio in 2000 rather all other countury have minimum amount of data.
On one side, In first step in 1970 countury the data amount was 10%, 20% to number of meals however, In 1980 countury the data incline dramatically of restaurant meals rather than fast food meals.moveover, the data from 1970-1980 were 10% , 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%, respectively.
On other side, In 1990-2000 of data ratio was more than others into both categories , subsequently In 1990 the data was 50%,60% , 35%.whereas, In 2000 countury the amount of data increase dramatically had 40%,60%,50% respectively.
- Some people think that only the society be blamed for any anti social behaviour. What is the cause antitires . Who is responsible for them cause. 56
- Some people believe they should keep all the money they have earned and should not pay tax to the state.do you agree or disagree. 11
- The performance of staff can have a significant impact on the success of a company. What can companies do to inclined staff productivities. 11
- It is said that adulation food is key reason behind deteiated health of all age group masses how you agree or disagree with it 67
- Some people believe that movies should be based on social stigma while other believe that Based on real life heroes?discuss both side 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...it is data is calibrated into per centum .it is clear and coherent representation....
^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...veover, the data from 1970-1980 were 10% , 15%, 20%, 30%, 40%, respectively. On...
^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...as more than others into both categories , subsequently In 1990 the data was 50%,6...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ubsequently In 1990 the data was 50%,60% , 35%.whereas, In 2000 countury the amoun...
^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amount of data increase dramatically had 40%,60%,50% respectively.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 719.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21014492754 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96070198596 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615942028986 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4498513377 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.75 112.824112599 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.5 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156212072947 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988384830122 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087115952347 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988384830122 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087115952347 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.4 13.2329268293 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.53 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.