The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025.
The given map describe data about the structure of the meeting centre in 2010 and its future construction plan in the year 2025.
Looking from general perspective, the car park will be enlarged and the conference building is planned to construct several rooms in the following years.
In terms of the Northern part, the car parking lot is expected to be replaced by residence hall, with the capacity of 20 rooms. Instead, this will be expanded and relocated to the previous garden in the year 2025. Moreover, the hall, reception area and rooms at the corner in 2010 are remained intact in the future.
Refer to the South of the centre, IT and kitchen department at the left corner will be constructed in 2025. Meeting rooms with game and music one are planned to appear, which narrow the central garden of the building in the layout.
Interestingly, constructed plan in 15-year period is mainly garden depletion, which is supposed to make way for department for utilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 11 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 11 | view |
- The picture below shows the difference in the layout of the conference centre in 2010 and 2025 87
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 78
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas Do you think it is a negative or positive development 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'gardened'.
Suggestion: gardened
...ructed plan in 15-year period is mainly garden depletion, which is supposed to make wa...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90963855422 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63275067312 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560240963855 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1707554395 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114041171612 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502016806467 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043649703797 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0644301414264 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493075458929 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.