The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 comparing to 2008.
As can be seen from the map, the medical centre experienced a dramatic transformation with the addition of an education room, a mother and child room, a pharmacy and a store room.
In 2008, there exissted a small medical centre with a limited number of rooms but it was expanded in the next 2 years. In comparison with the medical centre in 2008, most of the rooms stayed unchanged and other new rooms were added to the medical centre in 2010. Three doctor’s office rooms on the top of the medical centre were downsized to construct another doctor’s office room and a store room. On the east-south of the medical centre, a new pharmacy was erected.
With a reference to the bottom left hand-corner of the medical centre, a mother and child room was constructed and on the north of it, an education room was also built in 2010.
- Some people give more importance to artists painter writers musicians in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science What do you think Do people prefer arts to technology in your view 78
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000 67
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...it was expanded in the next 2 years. In comparison with the medical centre in 2008, most o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70303030303 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66436539822 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.737346843 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330505669488 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228572155168 0.103423049105 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.320326080402 0.0843802449381 380% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326515706119 0.15604864568 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.392161515512 0.0819641961636 478% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.