The pictures below show the changes of the park from 1980 to now
The provided diagram illustrates the information about the new changes occurred in the park from the year 1980 till now.
Overall, the area of the flowers which was present in the 1980 map replaced by the Bush and Play ground in the current picture.
At a fleeting glance, it is immensely clear that in year 1980 the northeastern part of the park occupied by the tree later transformed into picnic, chairs, desks and barbecue trees. Besides this, the flowers which were situated in the south western area of the park converted into the Bush in the present map.
Further scrutinising the picture, in the year 1980 it is noticeably observed that pond and the bench that located in the west direction near entrance remain unchanged in present. At the last, the play ground which is constructed in the current picture replaced the flowers that was situated opposite side of the bench, pond and flowers in 1980.
- It is better learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pictures below show the changes of the park from 1980 to now 73
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 84
- Many people believe that living a city life offers greater benefits as compared to country side To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows the percentage of the rooms occupied in six hotels during may to September between 1985 and 2000 the table also incates the Star rating of each hotel 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ed into the Bush in the present map. Further scrutinising the picture, in the year 1...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87179487179 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46960483893 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.58428337 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211848540692 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106098386414 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959513206479 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13804868014 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104726235559 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.