The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s.
The pie chart presents the main causes why farm land becomes degraded worldwide.
Globally, up to 65% of land degradation are from over-grazing and cutting down trees. 35% belongs to over-grazing and 30% for deforestation. In third place is over-cultivation with 28%. However, other reasons for land degradation are less concern as only 7% contributes to the issue.
The causes of land degradation varies in 3 different regions. In Europe, the main causes involved 9.8% deforestation and 7.7% over-cultivation. Europe contains the total of 23% land degraded, making it the highest among the three. Oceania takes second place although over-cultivation did not contribute to the issue. Out of 13%, 11.3% are from over-grazing the land. Lastly, North America contains only 5% of the total degraded land.
Overall, the main issues that contributed to land degradation are over-grazing, over-cultivation, and deforestation. Even when the overall causes worldwide are high in digits, the main causes are different in each region.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-04 | Wardiati Yusuf | 73 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 84
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 78
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The pie chart shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rn as only 7% contributes to the issue. The causes of land degradation varies in...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ultivation. Europe contains the total of 23% land degraded, making it the highest...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vation, and deforestation. Even when the overall causes worldwide are high in dig...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53797468354 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38207500525 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.9959139445 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.3076923077 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.1538461538 22.9334400587 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179005878574 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722805667476 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731093660866 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147024550861 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832546848354 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.96 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.