The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students, PhD students, and junior lecturers at an Australian university.
The pie charts illustrate how many journal articles are read by all students, PHD students and junior lecturers at a university in Australia.
Overall, it can be seen that PHD students read more number of articles than other groups. Furthermore, majority of students read no more than 5 articles per week while most of the junior lecturers read between 6 to 11 articles.
The majority of students were found reading 1 to 5 articles per week which accounted for 67%. However, this figure was significantly lower among PHD students and junior teachers which was 5% and 1% respectively. Surprisingly, 75% of junior lecturers read between 6 to 11 journal articles in a week.
On the other hand, the percentage of doctorates students who read more than 12 journal articles within a week was significantly higher, at 80%. Meanwhile, among other students and junior lecturers, these figures accounted for 12% and 24% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-03 | jazzlen | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-11 | nahid_tavasspli | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-09 | sivasankar | 67 | view |
| 2021-02-03 | Manzura | view | |
| 2021-10-14 | YESWANTH KALUVA | 42 | view |
- Success in business can be assured if you have great marketing and promotion. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 77
- The table below gives information about UK independent films Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 21
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15131578947 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96522288288 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559210526316 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3798877343 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373201259756 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186744561673 0.103423049105 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142874650463 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27015793906 0.15604864568 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149214147826 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.