The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The pie charts given below describe average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia at 2010. The data measured in percentage.
It can be seen that Housing is the first place as the biggest number for the second country mentioned above, with the highest average for the first country mentioned was Other Goods an Services, Healthcare was the lowest.
Taking a closer in every sector values of the both charts was not predictable. For example Other Goods and Services was the most financing matters in Japan. Sticked tight by Food at range nearly a quarter, Followed with Housing which had just over a fifth, then fourth placed was Transport which had a fifth. Healthcare located on the bottom place has took 6% of total amount.
Meanwhile just under more than a third of entire household outgoing in Malaysia were for Housing . Other Goods and Services next to Food in the second and thirth ranking which were obtained a digit deviation among just over a quarter. Thus Transport was in the 4th list with one in ten. The last major was Healthcare which was lowest rate of a very small number.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 78
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy of France in two years 67
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 74
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main futures and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Linking, undefined,
Linking, undefined,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...first country mentioned was Other Goods an Services, Healthcare was the lowest. ...
^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an service' or simply 'Services'?
Suggestion: an service; Services
...first country mentioned was Other Goods an Services, Healthcare was the lowest. Taking a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...lthcare located on the bottom place has took 6% of total amount. Meanwhile just u...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...m place has took 6% of total amount. Meanwhile just under more than a third of entire ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ld outgoing in Malaysia were for Housing . Other Goods and Services next to Food i...
^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...it deviation among just over a quarter. Thus Transport was in the 4th list with one ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the lowest'.
Suggestion: was the lowest
...en. The last major was Healthcare which was lowest rate of a very small number.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, then, third, thus, while, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84126984127 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37904634168 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613756613757 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.6346498812 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1818181818 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162219722591 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790326968701 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182142274004 0.0843802449381 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163778729972 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.221732501994 0.0819641961636 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.