The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
Given are two graphs comparing the spending of families dwelling in an unnamed country in the year of 1950 and 2010. All in all, housing serving as the leading expenditure in 1950 was overshadowed by food purchase after a period of more than a half century.
It is evident from the chart of 1950 that housing enormously outweighed all categories at a staggering 72.1%. Second in terms of household expenses was the cost relating to eating at 11.2%, while education picked up some 6.6% in their overall spendings. Meanwhile, people living in this nation invested less than 5% for health care service, transportation, as well as other kinds of needs in this year.
In stark contrast, considerable shifts of proportion took place in 2010. Families of this country have their housing rent diminished significantly to occupy a striking low of 22% of overall spending, compared with a threefold growth in food expenditure resulting 34% of the overall expenses. Cost derived from transportation and other unknown services, likewise, were witnessed a remarkable growth to 14% and 19.2% respectively.
Noteworthy is the fact that the country saw a notable drop on the spending of health care and education in 2010.
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate. Which do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 89
- The average standard of people's health is likely to be lower in the future than it is now.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 89
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining while others think that their sole purpose is to educate Which do you agree with Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 95
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94894574242 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631313131313 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4670225369 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176435164725 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673664803207 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473407900974 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103491671053 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363071131795 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.