The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
These pie charts given information about the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. The data presents in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage in the Japan was other goods and services whilst housing in the Malaysia while the most lowest trend was health care in the Japan and Malaysia.
In 2010, the most highest household expenditures in Japan was other goods and services which stood at 29% while in Malaysia was housing which market 34%. Followed by the second highest of both of contries was food which noted at 24% in Japan whilst in Malaysia which market at 27%. Then it was followed by the third highest was housing which stood at 21% in Japan while in Malaysia was other goods and services which was standing 26%. Next it was followed by the fourth highest of both of contries was transport which was 20% in Japan whilst in Malaysia which was 10%. Finally, the most lowest of both of contries was health care which stood at 6% in Japan whilst in Malaysia which was 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- The pie charts bellow show the comparison of the different kinds of energy production of france in two years 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 67
- The bar chart shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union.The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'lowest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: lowest
...hilst housing in the Malaysia while the most lowest trend was health care in the Japan and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the lowest'.
Suggestion: most the lowest
...hilst housing in the Malaysia while the most lowest trend was health care in the Japan and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
... the Japan and Malaysia. In 2010, the most highest household expenditures in Japan was oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the highest'.
Suggestion: most the highest
... the Japan and Malaysia. In 2010, the most highest household expenditures in Japan was oth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other goods and services which stood at 29% while in Malaysia was housing which ...
^^
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'lowest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: lowest
...in Malaysia which was 10%. Finally, the most lowest of both of contries was health care whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66847826087 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29535133693 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 71.0 106.607317073 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.385869565217 0.547539520022 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7314246281 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209703880852 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146685219972 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181690726812 0.0843802449381 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255827543911 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147273948765 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.