The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts give data about the average household expenses made in a country in the year 1950 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that housing expenditure represented two-third of the total spendings in the past. However, in the last given year, food accounted for majority of the expenses while people also spent more for housing and other purposes.
In terms of housing, 72.1% of expenses were related to housing in 2001, but this figure declined drastically to a low of 22% throughout the 60 year period. In 1950, besides housing, people also spent a large proportion of their money on food, at 11.9%. Surprisingly, this value rose sharply reaching the rate of 34% in 2010.
In the 60 year period, expenses for transportation and other sources also experienced a significant change in their value. In 1950, the proportion of transport and other expenditures accounted for only 33% and 44%, while in 2010, these values experienced a dramatic increase of 10.7% and 14.8% respectively. Lastly, the rate of expenses in the remaining categories only changed slightly, at 4.5% for education and 6.3% for health care in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-26 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | lennie.butera | view | |
| 2021-08-25 | Amelie | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | prathamp114 | 56 | view |
- Most people agree that money cannot bring happiness. Why is happiness difficult to define? How can people achieve happiness? 61
- In the past, shopping was a routine domestic task. Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby.To what extent do you think this is a positive trend? 61
- The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island according to a survey of visitors 87
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about UK independent films Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 21
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, lastly, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05347593583 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78644008266 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9853361464 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112064046683 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556817041421 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837531017349 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983225106604 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106784189545 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.