The pie chart provides information about three different continents’ and the world’s water consumption rates in three different sectors which are domestic, agriculture and industry.
Overall, Asia Africa and world use lot of water for agrarian purposes opposed to Europe which uses most of the water for industry. Usage of water for domestic has the least the percentage for all four pie charts.
European uses most of their water for manufacturing which is more than a half whereas world's percentage for those is only slightly less than half of European's usage. In Europe, water consumption for farming is second but in Asia and Africa usage of water for those are first ranked and its ratio is nearly two and half times as higher as than Europe which is 86 percent. This situation valid for whole the world, too.
Water consumption for the house and daily purposes accounted for at least. This value is less than a quarter for all the graph. Africa, Asia, and the World have the similar ratio of 7%,6%, and 8% respectively. However, Europe uses their water resources for those more which is nearly 15%.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 73
- The table below gives information about languages with the most native speakers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feathers, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- How might the differences between online education and traditional education affect the educational experiences. State your position and support it with reasons and examples 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 336, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... is nearly two and half times as higher as than Europe which is 86 percent. This s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, whereas, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96808510638 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58127287777 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526595744681 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0305369772 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313809951163 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134371329365 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976506251384 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220710976771 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745228098968 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.