The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the samepark today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The layout below illustrate a public park when it first established in 1920 and the same park in the present.

To begin with, in 1920 the park had one large fountain in the middle of park and located between two main entrances. Moreover, in the eastern part of park we have stage for musicians, that has place between 2 rose gardens. Consequently, 4 seats has been add on both sides of rose garden. In the right side of north entrance we have rose garden and pond for water plants, and in front of them we have glasshouse and seats that located beside the glasshouse. Lastly, if you go out from south entrance and north entrance you will arrive at Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street

The park has altered dramatically since then. Firstly, the stage for musicians is being replaced by Amphitheatre for concerts, rose garden and pond for water plants are being replaced by cafe and children's play area, the glasshouse and seats are alternated by water feature. Moreover, 4 seats and 1 rose garden are already been removed. Lastly, there is a new entrance for underground car parking area.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-11-08 Elahe Rasooli 73 view
2021-04-24 Naheer 67 view
2021-04-24 mangpahang 11 view
2020-08-25 Hellan Nguyen 73 view
2020-05-29 haphuongpham49 61 view
Essays by user nakun11 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'added'.
Suggestion: added
...gardens. Consequently, 4 seats has been add on both sides of rose garden. In the ri...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, so, then, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 899.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73157894737 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4970287052 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573684210526 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2188586272 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8888888889 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101237969031 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540891312602 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847504156716 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116595865272 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108979704794 0.0819641961636 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.