The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words

The maps below depict a public park in two different years, 1920 and 2021. Overall, it is noticeable that there are a lot of modifications made during 101-year-period.

In detail, in 1920 Stage for Musicians was located on the west side of the Park, surrounded by two different Rose gardens on its North and South side. Moreover, there were also four different Seat rows which was located on the west side of the Park. Next, on the center of the Park there was a Fountain, and two different entrances named Arnold Avenue Entrance and Eldon Street Entrance. Lastly, on the east side of the park there were another Rose Garden and Pond for Water Plants on the top, while there were another Seat rows and Glasshouse on the bottom.

Meanwhile, in 2021, on the west side of the Park, the Stage for Musicians has been demolished and as a replacement, new Amphitheater for Concerts has been built. Next, there is only one Rose Garden on the west side of the Park which is located on the North of Amphitheater for Concerts. In the center of the Park, the Fountain has been replaced by Rose Garden, which is surrounded by four different Seat rows. However, the former entrances, Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street entrances are still maintained. After that, on the east side of the Park, the Rose Garden has been turned into Cafe, while Pond for Water Plants has also been changed into Children's Play area. Lastly, Glasshouse and Seats have been changed into Water feature and Entrance for Underground Car Park.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74427480916 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48163524513 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427480916031 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5372040851 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.583333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111301455213 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547110730571 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432328393354 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093720462917 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195650441488 0.0819641961636 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.