The provided map elucidates the shifts of a public Grange Park between 1920 when it was first established and nowadays.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there are massive changes since 1920 and Grange Park has been renovated into a modern park with so many facilities.
In 1920, the center of Grange Park was built a fountain for people. That fountain was demolished and replaced by a rose garden with four seats surrounding it today. Next to the rose garden is the amphitheater for organizing concerts which space has created a stage for musicians in 1920. At the top right corner of the map in 1920 was a pond for water plants next to a rose garden. Both of these amenities have been replaced by a children’s play area at the corner and a cafe right next to it. Seats and a glasshouse during 1920 were also destroyed and innovated to build a water feature with an entrance underground car park today.
From 1920 to today, entrances in Arnold Avenue and Eldon Street still stayed intact as well as the rose garden at the top left corner of the map. Both the seats surrounded the park and a rose garden at the bottom left corner were also removed to get a space for other facilities of the park today.
- we are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future is it good for us to reply so much on computers 89
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that the best way to make road transport safer is to make vehicle drivers take a driving test every year To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram details the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- Differences between countries are becoming less evident Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, still, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61261261261 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46320211553 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9218369441 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24501821227 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110052890728 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830742269798 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181496968695 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591934412731 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.