The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The plans provide comparisons between the park design in 1920 when it was opened and that of the contemporary one.
Looking from all perspectives, it is readily apparent that a great deal of alternation took place particularly in terms of facilities. Firstly, the foundation in the middle of the park is replaced by a squared rose garden with seats on respective sides, and the stage at the left is also upgraded to an amphitheater for concerts. Moreover, the pond at the top right corner of the park is now transformed into a playground for the children whilst the rose garden next to it became a coffee shop where visitors can dive in. Another significant renovation would be the water feature in the lower right corner of the park, which substituted the place of glasshouse in the past. There are also minor changes such as the removal of some rose gardens and repositioning of the seats.
To sum up, the present design has decorated the park with much better facilities and upgraded features, compared to that in where it was first opened, 1920.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, so, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8021978022 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7569718192 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626373626374 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.940267523 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.857142857 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192694884383 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864245784799 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862699574308 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163345524868 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764227755479 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.