The provided figures illustrate the information about the different of a small theater in 2010 and in the next two years. In general, it is clearly apparent that the theater was extended and more facilities were built.
Looking in more detail from the pictures, auditorium was the only room that had no change during the period that contained of 16 chairs. However, the stage in front of it was enlarged and the space that used to be utilized as media was functioned as hall. The media was moved to the side room that used to be used as storage completed with new showers while the new storage was built in the opposite side of the media.
Regarding the part outside the auditorium, enlargement also done at the left side of the main entrance. In 2012, the new restaurants was provided at the left corner of the main entrance while the ticket office was moved to the other side which used to be a cafe. Finally, admin office was relocated at the opposite corner of the restaurants.
- Many people believe that it is a good idea to have a dress code at work place Do you agree or disagree with statement 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart below shows changes in three different areas of crime in manchester city centre from 2003 to 2012 78
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy 84
- The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, regarding, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61363636364 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45780507468 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5680975042 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0883164773033 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442987823747 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635559799211 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778244739309 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0778781392212 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.