It is widely argued that due to increased fee and less number of job opportunities, universities should offer more technical and medical courses instead of art, history, and philosophy. I strongly disagree with this view. From my point of view, art and history are vital for our society. This essay will elaborate on the facts to support the stated opinion.
To begin with, even though technical and medical fields are more in demand and they have lucrative job offers, but there are numerous people who are more keen on learning art, history, and literature. By eliminating these fields from the education system, universities would deprive people of learning their choice of field. Furthermore, students should be provided with equal opportunities to explore all majors. Hence, they can decide later which stream is more suitable for them. For example, students have to study subjects such as Maths, Science, and Art up to a certain level in high school, afterward they can elect their stream based upon their interest and performance.
Further, there is a huge scope of improvement in the preservation of libraries and museums, moreover, the studies of history empower us to be prepared for the future and learn from our past mistakes. Similarly, arts and other traditional subjects allow us to learn to appreciate life. For instance, we revere Van Gauge and Leonardo da Vinci as much as we admire Sir Isaac Newton and Einstein. The world needs great artists and historian no less than it needs scientists and technicians. Thus the government should not neglect the fact that without art and history major there will be no people to work with books and paintings. In addition to this, the government should encourage people to work in art and history fields, also the government should increase the number of job openings in these fields so that people are motivated to pursue their career in non-technical fields.
In conclusion, Art and History are equally as important as technology and science. To protect our art and culture, we need more people with specialization in these fields as well. The government and the educational institutes must ensure the future prospectus of art and history in order to keep these streams alive.
- Physical education and sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools.Do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs. therefore, it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 30
- Physical education and sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools Do you agree or disagree with this statement 92
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- Some people think that genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 488, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...an it needs scientists and technicians. Thus the government should not neglect the f...
^^^^
Line 8, column 36, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
.... In conclusion, Art and History are equally as important as technology and science. To...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 25.0 6.8 368% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 5.60731707317 535% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 965.302439024 195% => OK
No of words: 370.0 196.424390244 188% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08648648649 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70990391987 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 106.607317073 191% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 283.868780488 203% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 8.94146341463 201% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0727513077 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 5.23603664747 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 3.70975609756 431% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162188963021 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492279676365 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455875434565 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104538934074 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343896208937 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 40.7170731707 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.