Even though there are many developments have been taken place in the field of agriculture, the problems related to hunger has not been eradicated completely. There are a variety of possible reasons for this; however, steps can definitely be taken to tackle the problem.
To commence with, there are myriad reasons behind this issue. One of the most prominent reasons is the overstaking. Wealthy businessmen stock the large amount of stock in their godowns in order to create a shortage of food in the market. When the food of the price is increased then they sell their stacks at higher price to get high profit. Hence, people who live below poverty line are not able to buy food at such high prices. Another point to consider is that the lack of infrastructure. For example, in India, after green revolution there is not a problem for food shortage. However, due to poor road conditions food can not be reached on time to people who are living in remote areas. Similarly, due to lack of cold storage food items can not be stored for long time and it leads to the wastage of food.
There are plethora of ways which can be implemented by government to eradicate this problem. First of all, government should impose stringent laws against the overstaking of food. Thus, it would help to prevent from man made price fluctuations. Apart from that, states should run the public awareness program to make the people aware about the importance of the food and motivate them not to waste food products. Lastly, authorities should give the boost in creating the infrastructure for storing the food for long time and connect the remote areas with all weather roads to ensure that food will come on time.
In conclusion, although there are many reasons for the starvation, some crucial methods can be taken by governments to eradicate this problem.
- In spite of advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problems 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- the chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT IT IS BEST TO ACCEPT A BAD SITUATION SUCH AS AN UNSATISFACTORY JOB OR SHORTAGE OF MONEY OTHERS ARGUE THAT IT IS BETTER TO TRY AND IMPROVE SUCH SITUATIONS DISCUSS BOTH WITH OPINION 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...hen the food of the price is increased, than they sell their stacks at higher price ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'storages'' or 'storage's'?
Suggestion: storages'; storage's
...e areas. Similarly, due to lack of cold storages food items can not be stored for long t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, lastly, similarly, so, thus, apart from, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 965.302439024 159% => OK
No of words: 316.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85126582278 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5876924971 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 106.607317073 167% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563291139241 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 283.868780488 168% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4394108479 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1764705882 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160028008867 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580040026023 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665434363487 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126660117498 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437678891441 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 40.7170731707 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.