The table below gives information about the past and projected figures in various countries for different years.
The provided table reports the population in four different countries namely Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United State from 1990 to 2020 and its projection in 2050.
Overall, it is of note that the rates of growth of four countries remains constant over the period, however, there are remarkable differences in total populations.
It can be clearly seen New Zealand is populated by the smallest population and reflect the lowest rate of growth among 4 countries. With 3.4 million in 1999, New Zealand’s population rose to 3.8 million in 2000 and anticipated to reach 4.7 million in the next 50 years. Likewise, the USA population, featured the same pattern, are always hundred times as large as the former’s.
Regarding Canada, there was an increase by 2.1 million in the last decades of the twentith century and a projection by 50 percent of the figure of 1990 in 2050. The last country modestly started at 17.1 million and experienced a minor rise by 0.6 milion in 1993, predicting that Australia population will achieve Canada intial number
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature Write a 150 word description of this diagram for a university lecturer
- The diagram below shows the plan of a medical centre in 2008 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the com 78
- The data of retail sectors in online platform in term of 4 different items in Canada in the year of 2005 and 2010 are depicted in these charts It is clear that Electronics and appliance were the top preference throughout dedicated years As can be seen fro
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
..., featured the same pattern, are always hundred times as large as the former’s. Regard...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lation will achieve Canada intial number
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04545454545 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75309742918 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642045454545 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.4908144515 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102774536867 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470705483415 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506387916881 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729962636827 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508737577753 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.