The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012.
The table illustrates the export value of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five nations from 2010 to 2012
In general, there was a gradual increase in the values of exports to Japan, China and Russia while a fluctuation was witnessed in the figures for Mexico and Saudi Arabia between 2010 and 2012. In addition, Japan was the largest market of importing kiwi fruit from New Zealand throughout the period
In 2010, Japan was the leading country of importing kiwi fruits from New Zealand with the value at $271,100,000.00, followed by $74,900,000.00 of exports to China and $6,000,000.00 of exports to Mexico. $968,000.00 was reported to be the value of exports to Russia, compared to only $290,000.00 of the value of kiwi fruits to Saudi Arabia
2 years later, Japan remained its first position of being kiwi fruit importer with the value rising sharply to $325,300,000.00 in 2012 while the values of exports to China and Russia were still lower, at $94,000,000.00 and $2,404,000.00 respectively. Meanwhile, in 2011, New Zealand earned only $2,400,000.00 from exporting kiwi fruits to Mexico, but then this figure went up marginally to $3,300,000.00 in 2012. By contrast, Saudi Arabia was still the least popular market of importing kiwi fruits from New Zealand with a slight increase to $407,000.00 as well as a radical drop to $82,000.00 in the value of exports
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-08-12 | duongbinhnam | view | |
| 2023-07-17 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Roy An | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-22 | Roy An | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfont area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concert between 2010 and 2015 73
- The table below gives information about the values of exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 61
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... by 4,900,000.00 of exports to China and ,000,000.00 of exports to Mexico. 68,000....
^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ia were still lower, at 4,000,000.00 and ,404,000.00 respectively. Meanwhile, in 2...
^^
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nwhile, in 2011, New Zealand earned only ,400,000.00 from exporting kiwi fruits to...
^^
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t then this figure went up marginally to ,300,000.00 in 2012. By contrast, Saudi A...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, still, then, well, while, in addition, in general, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94247787611 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67324392162 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473451327434 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.4926829268 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.5024840371 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 223.4 112.824112599 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.2 22.9334400587 197% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6 5.23603664747 279% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330454685376 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.245525707811 0.103423049105 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108271749212 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31099906706 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163174493009 0.0819641961636 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.4 13.2329268293 184% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.26 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.0 11.4329268293 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.9970731707 182% => OK
text_standard: 26.0 11.0658536585 235% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.