The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table provides information about expanses of consumer on three variety of categories in five various countries, namely; Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002. Each category is given in percentage.
Overall, the majority of consumers spend particularly on Food/Drinks/Tobacco category compared to others. It is worth to take into consideration that the largest expanses were spent by Turkey citizens on food related category, whereas Sweden's consumers were the most economical individuals with the lowest proportion of expedinture.
According to the data, citizens of Turkey was not only active consumers solely on food related category, but also they were so active on leisure and education related category with 4.35%. Likewise, as the lowest proportion of spendings by costumers was seen in Sweden on food related with 15.77% as well as clothing categories that accounted for 5.40% except for leisure and education category.
The proportion for clothing/footwear led by Italy. Primarily, Italy showed the highest percentage with 9.00%, whereas, some countries even did not reach 7% and with regard to Sweden which presented a merely 5.40%. a
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Disucss both thes 77
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 91
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 91
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en in Sweden on food related with 15.77% as well as clothing categories that acco...
^^
Line 7, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... The proportion for clothing/footwear led by Italy. Primarily, Italy showed t...
^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he proportion for clothing/footwear led by Italy. Primarily, Italy showed the hi...
^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
... Sweden which presented a merely 5.40%. a
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, likewise, so, well, whereas, except for, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5988700565 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06804110938 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621468926554 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.27582044 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.875 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0823048466437 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379817883838 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493680252885 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0571258147492 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470672254658 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.06136585366 122% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.