The supplied table depicts percentage of spendings for different goods in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
According to the data, people in Turkey and Ireland spent the most money for food/drink/tobacco than any other country, 32.14 per cent and 28.91 per cent respectively. When Swedish spends for grocery and tobacco was the lowest (15.77 per cent). Italy with 9 per cent of spends for clothes and shoes leaded in compared countries, when average spending in all named countries was slightly above or under six per cent in overall. As in spends for groceries and tobacco, population in Sweden spend the lest, just 5,4 per cent. Getting back to the details, as Spanish haven not been domination low or high in any category, their spends for leisure and education were the lowest with only 1.98 per cent, followed by Ireland with 2.21 per cent. Almost one time more Turkish spent for for pleasure activities and education than Ireland (4.35 per cent).
To sum up, people in Turkey had dominated in 2 of 3 categories, exceeding almost one time more than average.
- the bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world. 78
- Topic: When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph shows oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010. 78
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 771, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: for
...ent. Almost one time more Turkish spent for for pleasure activities and education than ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89071038251 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54452423867 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601092896175 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4305789089 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.875 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.625 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928625315867 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563312341626 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711023213745 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924425625664 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960145539216 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.