The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table depicts the details of age, average wage of the residents and their relation to poverty in three different states in the USA.
Overview, it is readily apparent that there are more teenagers living in Utal, meanwhile people over 60 living in poor conditions are more prevalent in California and Florida. Additionally, it is also noticeable that average income of inhabitants in California is the highest followed by Florida and Utal
In California, 16% of residents are under society’s well-off standard, with 17% people under 18 years old and 13% individuals over 60 years old. By contrast, the figure for people living in poverty in Florida is lower than the figure for poor citizens in California, by 4% and the percentage of people under 18 and over 60 is recorded at 16% and 23% correspondingly. In terms of average income, California is recorded at 23000, which is higher than Florida, by 1000.
To talk about Utal, the rate of people living in poverty is lower than the two aforementioned data with the figure being recorded at 9%. In addition, the proportion of young citizens is higher than people over 60, with 28% compared to 8%. The average wage of the citizens in this region is lower than California and Florida, by 60000 and 5000.
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Research shows that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people engage in unhealthy activities What is the cause of this What can be done 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87037037037 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76720209009 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476851851852 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.776536994 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0766466349797 0.215688989381 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044896829204 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628663183748 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741426758482 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076693653461 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.