The given line graph illustrates how the elder population rate in Japan, Sweden and America changed over the sixty-year period starting from 1940 with a forecast to 2040.
Overall, the entire percentage of the elder population in those 3 countries merely surged over the whole period with a fluctuation of the Japanese elder population.
Firstly, from 1940 to 1980, the Swedish and American elder population proportions were almost the same, as they both rose stably from 2% and 9% to 14% and 15% respectively. After that, from 1980 to 2020, the elder population rate of the USA maintained stability and then slightly increased to 16% while it fluctuated from 14% to 18% in Sweden. Subsequently, according to the prediction, in 2040, the elder residents in the USA and Sweden will continue leaping to 23% and 25% in sequence.
By contrast, from 1940 to 2020, the elder population rates in Japan were always kept at a lower level compared to the two others. To be specific, the rate was 5% at the beginning point, then it decreased to 3% in 1960 and experienced a period of stability until raised to 10% in 2020. Surprisingly, in 2040, the proportion is presumed to rocket to over 27% - the all-time high percentage between the three countries.
- The young today spend a large amount of their leisure time in shopping centres It is feared that this could have a negative influence on the young and society To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged Others believe that children who are taught to co operate rather than compete become more useful adults 73
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...percentage between the three countries.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92452830189 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81392644157 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.6240601238 43.030603864 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.5 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875132227669 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0417798143088 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339691103052 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634052461198 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256441410681 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.