The table compares information about how many cars were manufactured in three different countries Argentina, Australia, and Thailand, from 2003 to 2009.
Looking at the table, it is immediately apparent that the number of cars produced in Argentina and Thailand increased during the 6-year period. On the other hand, the figure for Australia decreased.
In 2003, amongst the three countries, Thailand had the largest number of cars manufactured, with the number reaching 735.852. The number of cars made in Australia was much lower, at 452.163. Meanwhile, the figure for Argentina was lowest, at only 235.088.
Over the next 3 years, the number of cars produced in Thailand peaked over 1 million before decreasing by 160.000 in 2009. Argentina witnessed a gradual increase in car production, with the number stooding at 352.759 in 2006 and reaching a peak of 466.089 in 2009.
On the other hand, there was a decrease in car production in Australia, with the number of cars manufactured dropping to 341.268 in 2006 and this number continued to decrease in 2009, which was twofold lower than Argentina and was threefold lower than Thailand.
- The table and pie chart give information about population in Australia according to different nationalities and areas 84
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 71
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The bar charts and line graph below show the results of a survey conducted over a three year period to discover what people who live in London think of the city Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wh 74
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23243243243 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77208246594 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9044506683 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.555555556 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324348507815 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134648549883 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882963018823 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184469928683 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679535443202 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.