The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003, 2006 and 2009.
The chart illustrates how many cars were produced in Argentina, Australia and Thailand during the six-year period between 2003 and 2009. It can be clearly seen that despite of a significant decrease in last two years, the majority of car production was made in Thailand while Argentina manufactured the fewest cars in three countries.
In 2003, nearly 736,000 cars were produced in Thailand whereas Argentina accounted for over 452,000 cars doubling the figure of Australia. Only after two three years later, the manufacture of cars in Thailand increased dramatically by over 400,000 cars and there is also a slight increase in the figure of Argentina. On the contrary, Australia made only 341,268 cars which were about 100,000 fewer than the first year of the period.
In 2009, the number of cars made in Thailand was approximately 1000,000 cars but this figure was slightly lower than that in 2006. Australia’s car production was also reduced to 245,624 cars while there were more than 100,000 cars were manufactured in Argentina compared with 2006 in the last year of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-28 | letrang250191 | view | |
| 2023-02-28 | letrang250191 | view | |
| 2023-02-28 | letrang250191 | view | |
| 2023-02-21 | Bao Trang | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-20 | Bao Trang | 78 | view |
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 78
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job On the other hand other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 92
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time Do you agree and disagree 61
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11797752809 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69178520924 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550561797753 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.0207526028 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235234814981 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132393434425 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518276327017 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182528560736 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338835859512 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.