The table below shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990, 2000 and 2010.
The provided table gives information regarding amount of milk produced yearly in four nations during 1990, 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear from the chart that Netherlands amongst the all countries recorded as highest producer of milk while, the production of milk was observed in the Guatemala.
As can be seen that, in the 1990, 11,262,000 litres of milk production was noticed in the Netherlands, which decreased significantly in the middle year and in 2000 it produced 11,466,000 liters of milk. Similarly, milk production in Australia was 11,246,000 liters and saw a dramatic drop in the following years. It was 11,105,000 in 2000 and 9,165,000 in the 2010 respectively.
In contrast, Tanzania and Guatemala showed the upward trend in the production of milk. Tanzania accounted for 87,000 litres then inclined sharply and reached at 1,55,000 in the 2010. However, number of litres produced in Guatemala was 26,000, it recorded almost doubled in 2000. Finally in 2010, Guatemala produced 84,000 litres of milk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-13 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-12 | muskan shaikh | view | |
| 2023-09-01 | vevinawynn | view | |
| 2023-09-01 | vevinawynn | view | |
| 2023-09-01 | vevinawynn | view |
- The diagram below shows information about member attendance at various clubs in a metro city 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
- In many cities crime is increasing. Why do you think this is happening? What can governments do to help reduce crime levels? 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and meat in European countries 11
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 89, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'as the highest'.
Suggestion: as the highest
...ands amongst the all countries recorded as highest producer of milk while, the production ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 280, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...00, it recorded almost doubled in 2000. Finally in 2010, Guatemala produced 84,000 litr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, regarding, similarly, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34355828221 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8296644041 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564417177914 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5398346858 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2897509615 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134965425675 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782698396639 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194777740053 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661636147778 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.