The table compares the percentages of the British people’s income went to four different categories in the year 1998.
It’s clear that the money spent on music related to children was the top consumption among the respondents, and the proportion between boys and girls were nearly the same. While, it seemed watching videos were the least popular entertainment in the UK.
Expenditures on music for children was the largest proportion seen in the table at 39%, boys’ and girls’ at 38% and 40% respectively. But, the given number in music of adults were merely 5%, nearly eight times less than that of children. Food was the second predominant expenditure for adults, there were 25% of them. However, women’s percentage was 39%, over doubled than men’s data, only 14%.
23% of children owned electronic equipment, with different patterns between boys and girls, taking up 18% and 5% separately. Also, the divergence on electronic equipment also could be seen amongst adults, women just 1% but men 10%. Children expended money on food at 10% and videos occupying 12% as well, not much difference between boys and girls’ data. The figures of videos were nearly neglect according to the table.
- The line graph shows three different crimes in England and Wales in 1970-2005. 73
- The chart below shows three different types of crime in England and Wales from 1970 to 2005 70
- The chart shows the number of international students from four different countries applyingfor universities in a European country from the year 2004 to 2008. 78
- The pie charts below show 5 reasons why people chose to leave/stayed in the UK. 84
- The news media plays an important role in modern societies Why are they important Do they have a positive or negative influence 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...en boys and girls were nearly the same. While, it seemed watching videos were the lea...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'neglected'.
Suggestion: neglected
...data. The figures of videos were nearly neglect according to the table.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nearly neglect according to the table.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27411167513 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81752868329 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634517766497 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0438239955 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4545454545 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845440521417 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0328149544746 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489087255855 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716256478791 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586457806138 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.