The table below Shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one University.
The table compares the proportion of student's points of view about five different facilities in a university over a period of 10-year.
Overall, what stands out is that the satisfaction rate in the electronic resources has increased during these years, while the range of modules offered declined.
In the year 2000, the highest percentage of satisfaction was in print resources, whereas the lowest one was in the range of modules offers, at 32 percent. This proportion of print resources had increased by 2 percent in 2008 and has decreased by 1 percent in 2010. The range of modules offer was the only group which lost the rate of satisfactory from 2000 t0 2010 and finally stood at 27 percent.
It is evident that the percentage of students who show their content with electronic resources rose significantly from 45 to 68 percent. Building/teaching facilities remained stable during the time, and teaching quality had followed a converse trend compare to print resources, which means first it dropped in 2005 and then started to rise till 2010, with 62 percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called islip as it is now ans plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as pratical problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananasin 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 61
- Some people believe that it is good idea to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to share freely Discuss both views and give your own 89
- The table below Shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one University
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08474576271 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89065741382 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604519774011 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8346543025 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140882268989 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606991208002 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380566677614 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748738941225 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488476895038 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.