The table elucidates the figure of labour force and silk mills in the England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.
Overall the number of workers had witnessed a sharply downward trend over the period, however, the quantity of factories was negatively correlated in the tendency.
As a deep analysis of the chart disclosure, it is explicitly observed that in the year 1851 , it was lump of labour. after having a tremendous sull to 109.869 the next decade, the number of employees experienced a enormous decline to 91412 in the year 1871 and 67904 in the year 1881. before plummeting to 49025 and 38942 among the year 1891 and 1901.
Giving a shufty on this period, it is lucid that from 1851 to 1861, the number of mills appreciable accelebration to 761 before seeing a slight lull to 693 in the year 1871. after it saw a modest drop to 663 and 623 on the last decade, the figure of factories underwent a minimal climb to 702 in the year 1881
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view 56
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 20
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Link table https drive google com file d 1bN1Kakm812OcI3ntl5QQlne RNQC5d M view 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...xplicitly observed that in the year 1851 , it was lump of labour. after having a t...
^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... the year 1851 , it was lump of labour. after having a tremendous sull to 109.869 the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...de, the number of employees experienced a enormous decline to 91412 in the year 1...
^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Before
...e year 1871 and 67904 in the year 1881. before plummeting to 49025 and 38942 among the...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... a slight lull to 693 in the year 1871. after it saw a modest drop to 663 and 623 on ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51764705882 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52058316448 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1809511275 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152688466538 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731042681579 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794517742623 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108631577123 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912600427599 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.