The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table compares the attendence of four kinds of secondary schools from 2000 to 2009.

Overall, the attendence of specialist schools, grammar schools and voluntary-controlled schools dwindled over the span of time. On the contrary, the enrollment of community schools boomed in the meantime.

The percentage of students attending specialist schools, grammar schools and voluntary-controlled schools decreased gradually from 2000 to 2009. Voltary-controlled schools, which composed with the largest proportion of attendence in the year of 2000, dropped from 53% to 20% in the year of 2009. Grammar schools attendence decreased from 24% in 2000 to 12% in 2009. Meanwhile, the enrollment of specialist schools dwindled slightly from 12% in 2000 to 10% in 2009.

However, community schools significantly expended its enrollment. The percentage of attendence in 12% in the year of 2000, which is the least proportion. The attendence mushroomed to 32% in the year of 2005. Thereafter, a drast increase can be seen in the year of 2009, when the proportion of students ranked the first and reached 58%.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35632183908 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94551303408 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.436781609195 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.881495449 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7272727273 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219652395347 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105219966843 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717206707206 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167912013837 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824170836392 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.