The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Two under tables compares the amount of euros which several various countries have obtained by coffee and banana which have been sold in two diverse years of 1999 and 2004.
It is clear that in the first chart coffee has gained the greatest amount of money for UK but the banana has been sold most in the Switzerland.
Sale of Fairtrade-labelled coffee in UK reached the high amount of 1.5 million of euros in 1999 and then soared to 20 million in 2004. On the other hand, UK has sold just 1 million and 5.5 million of banana in 1999 and 2004 respectively. Although Switzerland has made 3 million euros of selling coffee in 1999 and then doubled in 2004, the greatest amount of 15 million in 1999 and then approximately tripled to 47 million in 2004 for selling bananas.
Meanwhile, Denmark had almost the same amount of selling coffee and bananas in 1999, 1.8 and 2 million euros respectively, its coffee sales increased to 2 million in 2004 but the other one for bananas got in half to 0.9 million. Belgium sold 1 million coffee in 1999 and enlarged its selling to 1.7 million in 2004 and also for bananas it was 0.6 million in 1999 which increased to 4 million in the other year. The last category for Sweden which earned 0.8 and 1.8 million for coffee and bananas in 1999, ended up to 1 million euros in 2004 for both of the products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- Is technology time consuming or does it save time 67
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon 69
- In many countries people throw away a lot of food from restaurants and shops Why do you think people waste food in this way What can be done to reduce the amount of food thrown away 82
- Nowadays a higher number of people are moving to urban areas to improve their quality of life whereas living in the city can bring some challenges Living in cities could mean expecting some issues such as lack of green spaces due to the increasing number 40
- Some people believe than nowadays we have too many choices To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47967479675 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46794506802 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426829268293 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.8651514856 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.75 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232836704069 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140813586998 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453933479052 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151990776991 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471513676803 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.87 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.