The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The tables below illustrate the data regarding sale of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana throughout some European countries in 1999 and 2004.

According to the first table, it is transparently manifest that all the countries faced a growth in coffee sales from 1999 to 2004, while UK had a dramatic rise in the light of the fact that from 1.5 million euros in 1999 went up to 20 million euros in 2004. Although Switzerland doubled its sales during these five years from 3 million euros to 6 million euros, other nations like Denmark, Belgium and Sweden revealed slight increase from 1.8-2, 1-1.7 and 0.8-1 million euros between 1999 and 2004 respectively.

When it comes to second table, similarly, countries encountered an increase except Sweden and Denmark by 1.8 and 2 million euros in 1999 climbed to 1 and 0.9 million euros in 2004 respectively. Though UK and Belgium depicted significant increases across these years from 1-5.5 and 0.6-4 million euros, the amount sales are not important to focus on. On the other hand, Switzerland possesses an enormous amount sale and in 1999 it account for 15 million euros, while this country experienced a triple rise and it is stood in 47 million euros in 2004.

In conclusion, it is obviously noticeable that during these years countries unified their efforts to increase their sales with respect to Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accounts'?
Suggestion: accounts
... an enormous amount sale and in 1999 it account for 15 million euros, while this countr...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, similarly, so, while, in conclusion, with respect to, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10480349345 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83887802948 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53711790393 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.2889272106 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.0 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.4285714286 5.23603664747 276% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164042975699 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104945692587 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943988264029 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150555925036 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102309005253 0.0819641961636 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.