The provided tables compare the amount of money earned from two types of Fairtrade-labeled products, namely coffee and bananas in five discrepant nations in Europe from 1999 to 2004.
Overall, it is clear that there was an upward trend in the sales of coffee in all countries, while the banana’s sales in Belgium and Sweden experienced a decline over the examined years. Additionally, Uk earned the largest amount of money from coffee and banana productions by the end of the period.
Turning to the details,in 1999, the highest number of coffee sales was recorded in Switzerland, at exactly 3 million euros, followed closely by those of Denmark (1.8 million) and America (1.5 million) concurrently. After 5 years, the most significant growth in sales of coffee was witnessed in Uk, reaching 20 million euros , in comparison to a minimal increase in the figures for Denmark and Sweden ,at only 2 million and 1 million respectively.
Regarding the sales of bananas,15 million euros was earned in the Uk in 1999 compared with merely 2 million in Sweden and 1.8 million in Belgium. From 1999 to 2000, there was a considerable climb in the figures for Uk ( 47 million), Switzerland (5.5 million )and Denmark ( 4 million ) , whereas, the amounts of money Belgium and Sweden earned from banana sales went down to only 1 million euros in 2004.
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 84
- Some people think that studying from the past offers no benefits to today s life while others think that history is a valuable source of information Disciuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... nations in Europe from 1999 to 2004. Overall, it is clear that there was an u...
^^
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...f the period. Turning to the details,in 1999, the highest number of coffee sale...
^^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tnessed in Uk, reaching 20 million euros , in comparison to a minimal increase in ...
^^
Line 4, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...se in the figures for Denmark and Sweden ,at only 2 million and 1 million respecti...
^^
Line 6, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...considerable climb in the figures for Uk 47 million, Switzerland 5.5 million and ...
^^
Line 6, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, Switzerland 5.5 million and Denmark 4 million , whereas, the amounts of mon...
^^
Line 6, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rland 5.5 million and Denmark 4 million , whereas, the amounts of money Belgium ...
^^
Line 6, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...land 5.5 million and Denmark 4 million , whereas, the amounts of money Belgium a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95982142857 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80342822362 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.6601680723 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.714285714 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183195239851 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1073334107 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710531528639 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144033424987 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788565961714 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.