The given tables display how sales of Fairtrade-labeled coffee and bananas changed between 1999 and 2004 in five different countries.
Overall, sales of coffee increased in all five countries, while the figures for bananas in Sweden and Denmark decreased. The UK and Switzerland had the highest sales data on both coffee and bananas compared to others'.
In the first table, the UK experienced a marked rise in coffee sales, from 1.5 million in 1999 to 20 million euros in 2004. Switzerland followed that, doubling its data to 6 million in 2004. The other three nations saw a modest growth in coffee sales, reaching around 1.5 million euros in 2004.
Switzerland became the biggest buyer in the banana area, with 15 million euros in 1999, then jumping to 47 million euros in 2004. Banana sales in the UK and Belgium increased from 1 million and 0.6 million to 5.5 million and 4 million, respectively. Sweden and Denmark saw a slight decrease in banana sales, to 1 and 0.9 million, correspondingly.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy and projections for 2050
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extend to you agree or disagree 73
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96449704142 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77950352735 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514792899408 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0394672313 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214597138387 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109738681113 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912331264379 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176469578599 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106599042878 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.