The information about the changes in annual expenditure by a UK school in three different years is depicted by the rendered pie charts. The data has been calibrated in percentage.
To begin with, 40% of the spending on salaries of teachers in 1981. However, the annual expenditure by a UK school for resources and furniture and equipment was the same in 1981, it accounted for 15%. Moreover, the percentage of expenditure for workers' salaries was 28%. Only 2% of the annual spending by a UK school was noticed for insurance in 1981.
Moving towards, 22% and 20% of yearly spending by a UK school were seen in 1991 for workers' salaries and resources respectively. Furthermore, there was a drastic decrease observed in the spending on workers' salaries and books in 2001, it comprised to 15% and 9% correspondingly. In addition, a dramatic increase was noticed in the annual expense for furniture in a UK school in 2001, it was increased by 18%, it was 23%. 3% and 8% of annual spending on insurance in a UK school were noticed in 1991 and 2001. In 1991, the percentage of total spending on the salaries for teachers was 50%, but it was decreased by 5% in 2001.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that the highest proportion of the annual spending in a UK school for salaries of teachers throughout the span.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of the telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 67
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summa 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69396551724 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89865161465 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435344827586 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3846914483 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.75 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237050721532 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114522330087 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807178934982 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162336879657 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352745208678 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.